Judgment of the General Court of 21 September 2011 - Berliner Institut für Vegleichende Sozialforschung v Commission
(Financial assistance paid in the context of the Daphné II program - Determination of the amount to be paid to the beneficiary - Erroneous assessment)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: initially, B. Hening, then U. Claus and, finally, S. Reichmann and L.-J. Schmidt, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, S. Grünheid and B. Simon, then S. Grünheid and F. Dintilhac, Agents)
Re:
Application for the annulment of the Commission's decision of 16 November 2007 concerning the Commission's partial non-recognition of the costs incurred by the applicant in the context of Daphné Grant Agreement JAI/DAP/2004-2/052/W.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
Annuls the Commission's decision of 16 November 2007 concerning its partial non-recognition of the costs incurred by Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung eV in the context of Daphné Grant Agreement JAI/DAP/2004-2/052/W in so far as concerns the expenses relating to items A6, A39, A40, A41, A43 and E41;
Orders Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung to bear two thirds of its own costs and two thirds of the costs incurred by the European Commission. The Commission shall bear a third of its own costs and a third of the costs incurred by Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung.
____________1 - OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.