Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 November 2015 —
CEDC International v OHIM — Fabryka Wódek Polmos Łańcut (WISENT)

(Case T‑449/13)

Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark WISENT — Earlier national three-dimensional mark ŹUBRÓWKA — Relative grounds for refusal — Similarity of the marks — Articles 53(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

1.                     Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Identification of the subject-matter of the dispute — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — Lack of clarity and precision — Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 177(1)(d)) (see paras 16-18)

2.                     Community trade mark — Appeals procedure — Action before the EU judicature — Jurisdiction of the General Court — Review of the lawfulness of decisions of the Boards of Appeal — Subject-matter of the dispute before the General Court — Allegations of the parties changing the subject-matter of the dispute before the Board of Appeal — Inadmissibility (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 65(2); Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 188) (see para. 26)

3.                     Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark — Criteria for assessment (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 40, 41, 65)

4.                     Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds of invalidity — Existence of an identical or similar earlier trade mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Similarity of the marks concerned — Criteria for assessment — Composite mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 43, 55-57, 80, 81, 93, 101)

5.                     Community trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Relative grounds for refusal — Existence of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark — Figurative mark WISENT and three-dimensional mark ŹUBRÓWKA (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 113, 118, 127)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 June 2013 (Case R 33/2012-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Przedsiębiorstwo Polmos Białystok and Fabryka Wodek Polmos Łańcut SA.

Operative part

The Court:

1. Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 10 June 2013 (Case R 33/2012-4);

2. Orders OHIM and Fabryka Wódek Polmos Łańcut SA to bear their own costs and to pay those of CEDC International sp. z o.o.