Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 May 2011 – Jager & Polacek v OHIM (REDTUBE)
(Case T-488/09)
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark REDTUBE – Earlier unregistered national mark Redtube – Failure to pay the opposition fee within the prescribed period – Decision deeming the opposition non-existent – Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 – Protection of legitimate expectations – Rule 17 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 – Ex parte proceedings – Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 – Rule 18 of Regulation No 2868/95 – Legal nature of a communication from OHIM informing a party that an opposition has been found to be admissible – Rule of parallelism of procedural requirements and of the actus contrarius – Article 80 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009
Community trade mark – Registration procedure – Observation of third parties and opposition – Failure to pay opposition fee (Commission Regulation No 2869/95, Arts 8(3) and 8(4)) (see paras 38-41, 44-49)
Re:
| ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2009 (Case R 442/2009-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Jager & Polacek GmbH and RT Mediasolutions s.r.o. |
Information relating to the case
Applicant for the Community trade mark: | RT Mediasolutions s.r.o. |
Community trade mark sought: | Word mark REDTUBE for goods and services in Classes 9, 38 and 41 – Application No 6096309 |
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Jager & Polacek GmbH |
Mark or sign cited in opposition: | Non-registered trade mark Redtube |
Decision of the Opposition Division: | The notice of opposition is deemed not to have been entered |
Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |
Operative part
The Court:
1. | | 1. Dismisses the action; |
2. | | 2. Orders Jager & Polacek GmbH to pay the costs. |