Action brought on 12 February 2013 - FTI Touristik v OHIM (BigXtra)
(Case T-81/13)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: FTI Touristik GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by A. Parr, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 November 2012 in Case R 2521/12011-1;
Order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark 'BigXtra' for goods and services in Classes 16, 35, 39, 41, 42 and 43 - Community trade mark application No 9 925 868
Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009
____________