Language of document :

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 October 2015 — AC Treuhand AG v European Commission

(Case C-194/14 P) 1

(Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European tin stabiliser and ESBO/esters heat stabiliser markets — Article 81(1) EC — Scope — Consultancy firm not operating on the relevant markets — Definition of ‘agreement between undertakings’ and ‘concerted practice’ — Calculation of the amount of fines — The 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Unlimited jurisdiction)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: AC Treuhand AG (represented by: C. Steinle, I. Bodenstein and C. von Köckritz, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: H. Leupold, F. Ronkes Agerbeek and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

Dismisses the appeal.

Orders AC-Treuhand AG to pay the costs.

____________

1 OJ C 184, 16.6.2014.