Action brought on 9 September 2013 – MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack v OHIM – Cryo-Save (CryoSafe)
(Case T-482/13)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG (Billerbeck, Germany) (represented by: A. Thünken, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cryo-Save AG (Pfäffikon, Switzerland)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 4 July 2013 (Case R 1759/2012-4) and alter it to the effect that the appeal lodged by the applicant at OHIM is well-founded and the opposition is therefore to be rejected;
In the alternative, annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 4 July 2013 (Case R 1759/2012-4) and refer the case back to the competent Examiner at OHIM;
Order OHIM to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘CryoSafe’ for goods and services in Classes 5 and 40 – Community trade mark application No 9 619 586
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Cryo-Save AG
Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘CryoSave’ for goods in Classes 10, 42 and 44
Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld in part
Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009