Language of document :

Action brought on 15 January 2024 – Cinkciarz.pl v EUIPO (€$ We Think for You)

(Case T-20/24)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. (Zielona Góra, Poland) (represented by: E. Skrzydło-Tefelska and M. Stępkowski, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark €$ We Think for You – Application No 15 225 253

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 November 2023 in Case R 1256/2023-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), read in conjunction with Article 7(2), of Regulation 2017/1001;

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001, read in conjunction with Article 41(1) and (2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union by violating the principle of good administration and the right to be heard.

____________