Language of document : ECLI:EU:T:2012:373





Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 July 2012 —
Vermop Salmon v OHIM —
Leifheit (Clean Twist)

(Case T-61/11)

Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark Clean Twist — Earlier Community word marks TWIX and TWIXSTER — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

1.                     Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark — Assessment of the likelihood of confusion (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 20, 25)

2.                     Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Similarity between the goods or services in question — Criteria for assessment (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see para. 22)

3.                     Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Similarity of the marks concerned — Criteria for assessment — Complex mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 26, 27)

4.                     Community trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Relative grounds for invalidity — Existence of an identical or similar earlier mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark — Word mark Clean Twist and word marks TWIX and TWIXTER (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)), and 53(1)(a)) (see paras 34, 35)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 November 2010 (Case R 671/2010‑1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Vermop Salmon GmbH and Leifheit AG.

Operative part

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Vermop Salmon GmbH to pay the costs.