ORDER OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Third Chamber)
30 April 2015 (*)
(Rectification of judgment)
In Case F‑12/13,
ACTION brought under Article 270 TFEU, applicable to the EAEC Treaty pursuant to Article 106a thereof,
CQ, former member of the temporary staff of the European Parliament, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer,
applicant,
v
European Parliament, represented by M. Dean and E. Taneva, acting as Agents,
defendant,
THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL
(Third Chamber),
composed of S. Van Raepenbusch, President, E. Perillo and J. Svenningsen (Rapporteur), Judges,
Registrar: W. Hakenberg,
makes the following
Order
1 By judgment of 17 September 2014 in CQ v Parliament (F‑12/13, EU:F:2014:214), the Tribunal (Third Chamber) dismissed the action in which the applicant sought the annulment of the decision of 8 May 2012 of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of the European Parliament which had found, in accordance with the opinion delivered by its Advisory Committee on Harassment and its Prevention at the Workplace, that the applicant had not, while working as a member of the temporary staff, suffered psychological harassment on the part of her Head of Unit.
2 Pursuant to Article 122(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal may, of its own motion at any time or at the request of one of the parties made within two weeks after the decision at issue has been served, rectify clerical mistakes, errors in calculation and obvious inaccuracies in it.
3 The Tribunal has found that paragraph 74 of the English version of the judgment in CQ v Parliament, above, contains an obvious clerical mistake within the meaning of Article 122(1) of the Rules of Procedure. Consequently, it is appropriate for the Tribunal to rectify that judgment of its own motion as set out in the operative part of this order.
On those grounds,
THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL
(Third Chamber)
hereby orders:
1. The words ‘under Article 90 of the Staff Regulations’ in paragraph 74 of the version in the language of the proceedings of the judgment in CQ v Parliament (F‑12/13, EU:F:2014:214) shall now be changed to ‘under Article 90 of the CEOS’.
2. The original of this order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified judgment. A note of this order shall be made in the margin of the original of the rectified judgment.
Luxembourg, 30 April 2015.
W. Hakenberg | | S. Van Raepenbusch |