Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München (Germany) lodged on 22 April 2021 – KP v TV, Gemeinde Bodman-Ludwigshafen
(Case C-256/21)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Oberlandesgericht München
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: KP
Defendants: TV, Gemeinde Bodman-Ludwigshafen
Question referred
Must Article 124(d) and Article 128 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 1 be interpreted as meaning that the EU trade mark court has jurisdiction to rule on the invalidity of an EU trade mark asserted by a counterclaim within the meaning of Article 128 of that regulation even after the action for infringement based on that EU trade mark for the purposes of Article 124(a) has been validly withdrawn?
____________
1 Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark (OJ 2017 L 154, p. 1).