Order of the General Court of 28 June 2011 - van Arum v Parliament
(Appeals - Staff Cases - Officials - Reports - Staff report - Reporting exercise for 2005 - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Appellant: Rinse van Arum (Winksele, Belgium) (represented by: W. van den Muijsenbergh, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: J. F. de Wachter, K. Zejdová et R. Ignătescu, Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2009 in Case F-139/07 van Arum v Parliament ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000, seeking to have that judgment set aside.
Operative part of the order
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. Mr Rinse van Arum is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament in these proceedings.
____________1 - OJ C 37, 13.2.2010.