Action brought on 25 August 2009 - Häfele v OHIM - Topcom Europe (Topcom)
(Case T-336/09)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicants: Häfele GmbH & Co. KG (Nagold, Germany) (represented by: J. Dönch, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Topcom Europe NV (Heverlee, Belgium)
Form of order sought
Repeal the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 June 2009 in case R 1500/2008-2; and
Order the defendant to bear the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark "Topcom", for goods in classes 7, 9 and 11
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited: Community trade mark registration of the word mark "TOPCOM" for goods in class 9; Benelux trade mark registration of the word mark "TOPCOM" for goods in class 9.
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Upheld the appeal, allowed the opposition and annulled the decision of the Opposition Division
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Council Regulation 40/94 (which became Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 207/2009) as the Board of Appeal wrongly held that there was a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned, due to the fact that the goods in question are not similar nor complementary.
____________