Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — Tilly-Sabco v Commission
(Case T-397/13) 1
(Agriculture — Export refund — Poultry meat — Implementing regulation fixing the refund at EUR 0 — Action for annulment — Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures — Direct concern — Admissibility — Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 164(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 — Legitimate expectations)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Tilly-Sabco (Guerlesquin, France) (represented by: R. Milchior, F. Le Roquais and S. Charbonnel, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and K. Skelly, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Doux SA (Châteaulin, France) (represented by: J. Vogel, lawyer)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2013 of 18 July 2013 fixing the export refunds on poultrymeat (OJ 2013 L 196, p. 13).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
Dismisses the action;
Orders Tilly-Sabco to pay its own costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings;
Orders the European Commission to pay its own costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings;
Orders Doux SA to pay its own costs;
Orders the French Republic to pay its own costs incurred as an intervener in the interim proceedings.
____________1 OJ C 291, 5.10.2013.