Language of document :

Appeal brought on 17 April 2023 by European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 07 February 2023 in Case T-81/22, Euranimi v Commission

(Case C-252/23 P)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) (represented by: M. Campa, D. Rovetta, V. Villante, avvocati, P. Gjørtler, advokat,)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

declare admissible the present appeal;

set aside the order under appeal and declare the action brought by Euranimi admissible;

send back the case to the General Court for examining the substance of Euranimi’s action;

order the European Commission to bear the legal cost of the present appeal and of the procedure at first instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on three main pleas in law:

First plea: error in law in interpreting the Article 263 (4) TFEU and in particular the requisite of “direct and individual concern” - wrong qualification of facts.

Second plea: error in law in interpreting the final limb of Article 263 (4) TFEU and the requisite and notion of regulatory act which does not entail implementing measures - wrong qualification of facts and distortion of evidence.

Third plea: wrong qualification of facts and distortion of evidence.

____________