Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 June 2011 – Tecnoprocess v Commission
(Case T-367/09)
Action for failure to act – Request to act – Manifest inadmissibility – Action for damages – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law
1. Actions for failure to act – Institution called upon to act – Conditions – Clear and express request (Art. 232, second para., EC) (see para. 48)
2. Actions for failure to act – Institution called upon to act – Compulsory – Action brought before the expiry of the time-limit for the institution’s reply – Inadmissibility (Art. 232, second para., EC) (see paras 52-53)
3. Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Unlawfulness – Damage – Causal link – One of the conditions not satisfied – Claim for compensation dismissed in its entirety (Art. 288, second para., EC) (see paras 74-75)
4. Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Causal link – Concept – Burden of proof (Art. 288, second para., EC) (see paras 76-78, 83)
Re:
| ACTION, first, for a declaration that the European Commission and the European Union delegation to Nigeria have failed to act and, secondly, for compensation for damage allegedly suffered as a result of that failure to act. |
Operative part
1. | | The action is dismissed in part as inadmissible and in part as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
2. | | Tecnoprocess Srl is ordered to pay the costs. |