Action brought on 18 September 2006 - Diomede Basili v Commission

(Case F-108/06)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Tamara Diomede Basili (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: T. Bontinck and J. Feld, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities    

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

annul the career development report (CDR) notified to the applicant on 10 November 2005;

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a Commission official of grade AD 11, took part in the DG ECFIN Joint Evaluation Committee and in the Selection Board for competition COM/PA/04 during 2004. In her action, she challenges her CDR, in so far as it did not take into account the opinion of the 'ad hoc working party and the staff representatives' suggestions for promotion' laid down in Article 6(3)(c) of the general provisions implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations (GIP). In addition to the infringement of that provision of the GIP, the applicant alleges the infringement of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations and of Article 1 of Annex II to the Staff Regulations.

____________