Action brought on 27 April 2024 – KF v EIB

(Case T-222/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: KF (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare the present action admissible and well founded;

and consequently,

annul the decision of the EIB of 17 January 2024 rejecting the complaint of harassment in so far as it concerns B;

order the EIB to grant compensation for the applicant’s non-pecuniary damage, assessed at EUR 50 000;

order the EIB to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of the new Dignity at Work Policy and infringement of the powers, respectively, of the President and of the investigation panel.

Second plea in law, alleging breach of the concept of harassment and errors of assessment.

____________