Action brought on 13 June 2014 — Magyar Bencés Kongregáció Pannonhalmi Főapátság v European Parliament

(Case T-453/14)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Magyar Bencés Kongregáció Pannonhalmi Főapátság (Pannonhalma, Hungary) (represented by: D. Sobo

ovce (Slovakia) case;Order the

European Parliament

to examine the petition and take all the measures required by law;Order the European Parliament to pay the costs.Pleas in law and main argumentsIn support of the action, the applicant argues that the Petitions Committee inf

ringed procedural rules in that no reasons were stated for the contested decision.In that regard

, the applicant points out that, pursuant to Rul

e [215](8) of the Rules of Proce

dure of the European Parliament, petitions declared inadmissible by the committee are to be filed and the petitioner informed of the decision and the reasons for

it. The applicant also states that, in breach of that Rule, the defendant gave no reasons for its view that the subject matter of the petition had no connection with the European Union's fields of activity. The applicant also cites the judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2011 in Case T-308/07 Tegebauer v Parliament [2011] ECR II-279.