Language of document :

Action brought on 15 September 2010 - Yoshida Metal Industry v OHMI - Pi-Design and Others (surface covered with black circles)

(Case T-416/10)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Yoshida Metal Industry Co., Ltd (Niigata, Japan) (represented by: S. Verea, K. Muraro, M. Balestriero, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pi-Design AG (Triengen, Switzerland), Bodum France SA (Neuilly sur Seine, France), Bodum Logistics A/S (Billund, Denmark)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 May 2010 in case R 1237/2008-1;

Confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division of 15 July 2008 regarding Community trade mark application No 1372580;

Confirm the validity of Community trade mark registration No 1372580;

Order the defendant and the other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The figurative mark representing a surface covered with black circles for goods in classes 8 and 21 - Community trade mark registration No 1372580

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark right of the parties requesting the declaration of invalidity: The parties requesting the declaration of invalidity grounded their request on absolute grounds for refusal pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the application for declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and declared the Community trade mark registration invalid

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in concluding that the provisions of this article are applicable to the contested Community trade mark.

____________