Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg (Germany) lodged on 9 November 2023 – EL and Others v Volkswagen AG
(Case C-666/23, Volkswagen)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Landgericht Ravensburg
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: EL,CM, BT, JF, DS
Defendant: Volkswagen AG
Questions referred
Can the vehicle purchaser’s right to compensation against the vehicle manufacturer for the negligent placing on the market of a vehicle equipped with a prohibited defeat device within the meaning of Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 1 be refused on the grounds
a) that there was an unavoidable error on the part of the manufacturer as regards the wrongful nature of the act?
if the answer is yes:
b) that the error as regards the wrongful nature of the act was unavoidable for the manufacturer because the authority responsible for EC type-approvals or for subsequent measures actually authorised the installed defeat device?
if the answer is yes:
c) that the error as regards the wrongful nature of the act was unavoidable for the manufacturer since the vehicle manufacturer’s legal interpretation of Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 would have been confirmed by the authority responsible for EC type-approvals or for subsequent measures (hypothetical approval)?
Is the vehicle manufacturer who supplied a software update liable to pay compensation to the vehicle owner if the latter suffers a loss or damage as a result of a prohibited defeat device within the meaning of Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 installed with the software update?
Is it compatible with EU law if, in the case of a right to compensation against the vehicle manufacturer for the negligent placing on the market of a vehicle equipped with a prohibited defeat device within the meaning of Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007
a) the purchaser of the vehicle must allow the offsetting of the benefits derived from the use of the vehicle against the amount of compensation in their claim for ‘minor compensation’, where the benefits derived from the use, together with the residual value, exceed the purchase price paid less the amount of compensation?
b) the vehicle purchaser’s claim for ‘minor compensation’ is limited to a maximum of 15% of the purchase price paid?
____________
1 Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information (OJ 2007 L 171, p. 1).