Order of the General Court of 22 December 2023 – TB v ENISA

(Case T-322/21) ¹

(Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Reorganisation of ENISA – Implied decision not to identify head of unit posts as capable of being filled by means of internal mobility – Resignation of the applicant – No longer any interest in bringing proceedings – No need to adjudicate)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: TB (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) (represented by: I. Taurina, G. Pappa and C. Chalanouli, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the implied decision of the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) not to identify the posts of Head of the Policy Office Unit and Head of the Finance and Procurement Unit as capable of being filled by means of internal mobility, resulting from, first, in essence, the two vacancy notices of 5 August 2020 published on ENISA’s website concerning the posts of Head of the Executive Director Office Unit (ENISA-TA70-AD-2020-04) and Head of the Corporate Support Services Unit (ENISA-TA71-AD-2020-05) (together, ‘the vacancy notices of 5 August 2020’), and, secondly, Administrative Notice 2020-11 of 1 September 2020 on the conclusions of the dialogues for internal mobility (‘Administrative Notice 2020-11’). The applicant also seeks, in so far as necessary, annulment of, first, the vacancy notices of 5 August 2020 and Administrative Notice 2020-11, and, secondly, the decision of 3 March 2021 rejecting her complaint of 4 November 2020 against the implied decision, the vacancy notices of 5 August 2020 and Administrative Notice 2020-11.

Operative part of the order

1.    There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2.    Each party shall bear its own costs.

____________

¹     OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.