Order of the General Court of 7 March 2014 — FESI v Council
(Case T-134/10) 1
(Action for annulment — Dumping — Extension of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and China, as extended to imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather coming from Macao — Association representing independent importers — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures –Inadmissibility)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Fédération européenne de l’industrie du sport (FESI) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: E. Vermulst and Y. van Gerven, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by: J.-P. Hix and B. Driessen, Agents, assisted by G. Berrisch, lawyer, and N. Chesaites, Barrister, and subsequently by J.-P. Hix and B. Driessen, Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and M. França, Agents)
Re:
Annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and the People’s Republic of China, as extended to imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather consigned from the Macao SAR, whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (OJ 1996 L 352, p. 1).
Operative part of the order
The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
The Fédération européenne de l’industrie du sport (FESI) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.
The European Commission shall bear its own costs.
____________1 OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.