Action brought on 24 April 2015 – Dôvera zdravotná poistʼovňa/Commission

(Case T-216/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dôvera zdravotná poistʼovňa, s.a. (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented by: O

dravotná poisťovňa, a. s. (SZP)

and Všeobecná zdravot

ná poisťovňa, a. s. (VZP) (notified under do

cument C(2014) 7277) (OJ 2015 L 41, p. 25);order the Commission to pay the costs of the procedure. Pleas in law and main argumentsIn support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.First plea in law, alleging a misapplication of Article 107 (1) TFEUThe Commission has erred in law by misapplying the concept of undertaking in the specific context of Article 107 (1) TFEU.Second plea in law, alleging errors of law and manifest errors of assessmentThe Commission has, in setting and applying the criteria to determine the economic nature of the insurance scheme, committed errors of law and manifest errors of assessment in finding that SZP/VZP does not

der document C(2014) 7277) (OJ 2015 L 41, p. 25);order t

he Commission to pay the costs of the procedure. Pleas in law and main argumentsIn support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.First plea in law, alleging a misapplication of Article 107 (1) TFEUThe Commission has erred in law by misapplying the concept of undertaking in the specific context of Article 107 (1) TFEU.Second plea in law, alleging errors of law and manifest errors of assessmentThe Commission has, in setting and applying the criteria to determine the economic nature of the insurance scheme, committed errors of law and manifest errors of assessment in finding that SZP/VZP does not qualify as an undertaking and failed to provide adequate reasoning.

____________