Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 – Strålfors v OHIM (IDENTIFICATION SOLUTIONS)

(Case T-212/10)

Action for annulment – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Manifest inadmissibility

Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Pleas in law not set out in the application – Reference to the whole of the annexes – Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 44(1)(c)) (see paras 5-7)

Re:

ACTION against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 January 2010 (Case R 1112/2009-2), concerning an application for registration of word sign IDENTIFICATION SOLUTIONS as a Community trade mark.

Information relating to the case

Applicant for the Community trade mark:	Strålfors AB
Community trade mark sought:	Word mark IDENTIFICATION SOLUTIONS for goods in Class 16 – Community trade mark application No 8235186
Decision of the examiner:	Registration partially refused
Decision of the Board of Appeal:	Dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of the contested decision

Operative part

1.      The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.      Strålfors AB is ordered to bear its own costs.