Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 February 2014 –Probst v Commission
(Case F-75/13) 1
(Staff cases — Officials — Expatriation allowance — Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Request for re-examination — Material new facts — Action manifestly inadmissible)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Norbert Probst (Genval, Belgium) (represented by: initially, D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers, and subsequently by D. Abreu Caldas, J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and V. Joris, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision not to grant the applicant the benefit of the expatriation allowance
Operative part of the order
1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2. Mr Probst shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.
________________________1 OJ C 274 of 21/09/2013, p. 34.