Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 November 2012 — Shahid Beheshti University v Council
(Case T‑120/12)
Annulment action — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Lateness — Inadmissible
1. Actions for annulment — Actionable measures — Concept — Measures producing binding legal effects — Letter of an institution to inform the applicant of the adoption of certain measures and their grounds and to send him a copy of those measures — Not included (Art. 263 TFEU) (see paras 22, 23)
2. Plea of illegality — Incidental nature — Main action inadmissible — Inadmissibility of the plea (Art. 277 TFEU) (see para. 24)
3. Actions for annulment — Time limits — Point from which time starts to run — Measure entailing restrictive measures against a person or body — Date of communication of the grounds for the measure (Art. 263, sixth para., TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 102(1) and (2)) (see paras 26, 30, 34)
4. Proceedings — Time limit for instituting proceedings — Claim barred by lapse of time — Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure — Concept (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 45, second para.) (see paras 27, 43, 45, 48, 49)
5. Acts of the institutions — Decision — Notification to the registered office of the addressee — Regularity — No obligation on the institution to notify the relevant person or service in accordance with the addressee’s internal rules (Art. 297 TFEU) (see paras 37, 38, 40, 47)
6. Proceedings — Time limit for instituting proceedings — Period allowed for distance — Flat-rate nature — No infringement of the principle of equal treatment in relation to parties established in non-member countries distant from the Court (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 102(2)) (see paras 51-53)
7. Acts of the institutions — No general obligation to inform the addressees of measures of the judicial remedies available and of the time limits (see para. 55)
8. Proceedings — Admissibility of actions — Judged by reference to the situation when the application was lodged — Decision replacing the contested decision during the proceedings — Adaptation of initial forms of order sought and pleas in law — Possibility subject to the admissibility of the initial application (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 48(2)) (see para. 57)
Re:
| APPLICATION for annulment of Council Decision 2011/299/CFSP of 23 May 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 136, p. 65), Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2011 of 23 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 136, p. 26), Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, 71), Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11), as far as those acts concern the applicant, and the decision contained in the Council’s letter sent to the applicant on 5 December 2011. |
Operative part
1. | | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
2. | | Shahid Behesti University is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |