Order of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 3 July 2017 —
De Nicola v EIB
(Case T‑666/16 P)
(Appeal — EIB staff — Appraisal — Career development report — 2013 staff report — Application for annulment of the decision of the Appeals Committee and of the decision not to promote the applicant — Psychological harassment — Claim for damages)
1. Actions brought by officials — Jurisdiction of the EU judicature — Limits — Application of national law — Exclusion
(Art. 270 TFEU)
(see para. 14)
2. Officials — Staff of the European Investment Bank — Reports procedure — Staff report — Challenge before the Appeals Committee of the EIB — Ambit of the review
(Staff Regulations of the European Investment Bank, Art. 22)
(see para. 25)
3. Actions brought by officials — Staff of the European Investment Bank — Action directed against a decision of the Appeals Committee concerning appraisal — Judicial review — Scope
(Staff Regulations, Art. 91; Staff Regulations of the European Investment Bank, Art. 22)
(see para. 26)
Re:
APPEAL brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 21 July 2016, De Nicola v EIB (F‑100/15, EU:F:2016:167), seeking to have that judgment set aside. |
Operative part
1. | | The appeal is dismissed. |
2. | | Mr Carlo De Nicola is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present appeal. |