Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 September 2014 — Kyocera Mita Europe v Commission

(Case T‑35/11)

Actions for annulment — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff and statistical nomenclature — Classification in the Combined Nomenclature — Tariff subheadings — Customs duties applicable to goods classified under those tariff subheadings — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility

Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Meaning of ‘regulatory act’ in Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU — Any act of general scope for legislative measures — Regulation on the combined nomenclature — Included — Act comprising implementing measures within the meaning of that treaty provision — Existence of internal remedies against those measures — Inadmissibility of the action for annulment (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU; Commission Regulation No 861/2010, Annex) (see paras 33-39, 47, 48, 50, 51, 55)

Re:

ACTION for annulment in part of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) No 861/2010 of 5 October 2010 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2010 L 284, p. 1).

Operative part

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. It is not necessary to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by Konica Minolta Business Solutions Europe GmbH and Olivetti SpA.

3. Kyocera Mita Europe BV is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.