ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Eighth Chamber)
19 January 2011 (1)
(Rectification of a judgment)
In Case T-487/08,
Kureha Corp., established in Tokyo (Japan), represented by W. von der Osten-Sacken and O. Sude, lawyers,
applicant,
v
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent,
defendant,
the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court, being
Sanofi-Aventis SA, established in Paris (France), represented by
R. Gilbey, lawyer,
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 September 2008 (Case R 1631/2007-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Sanofi-Aventis SA and Kureha Corp.,
THE GENERAL COURT (Eighth Chamber),
composed of M. E. Martins Ribeiro, President, N. Wahl and A. Dittrich, Judges,
Registrar: E. Coulon,
makes the following
Order
1 On 16 June 2010 the Court gave judgment in Case T-487/08.
2 In accordance with Article 84(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the parties having been given an opportunity to lodge their written observations pursuant to Article 84(2) of those rules, it is necessary to rectify the clerical mistake(s) found in paragraph 36 of that judgment.
On those grounds,
THE GENERAL COURT (Eighth Chamber)
hereby orders:
In paragraph 36 of the judgment the text should read
‘In the absence of such information, the Office is obliged to reject the opposition as unfounded.’
instead of
‘In the absence of such information, the Office is obliged to reject the opposition as inadmissible.’
Luxembourg, 19 January 2011.
E. Coulon | | M. E. Martins Ribeiro |