Action brought on 21 February 2013 - Othman v Council

(Case T-109/13)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Razan Othman (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

declare the applicant's action admissible and well-founded;

consequently, annul Decision 2012/739/CFSP of 29 November 2012 and Regulation No 1117/2012 (EU) of 29 November 2012 and their subsequent implementing measures, in so far as they concern the applicant;

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of her action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those raised in the context of Case T-432/11 Makhlouf v Council. 

____________

¹ - OJ 2011 C 290, p. 13.