Appeal brought on 11 October 2007 by Michael Alexander Spenser against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 10 September 2007 in Case F-146/06, Speiser v Parliament

(Case T-390/07 P)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Michael Alexander Spenser (Ixelles, Belgium) (represented by F. Theumer, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament

Form of order sought by the appellant

Annul paragraphs 1 and 2 of the operative part of the decision of the Civil Service Tribunal in full;

Annul paragraph 3 of the operative part of the decision of the Tribunal in so far as it does not order the other party to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appeal is directed against the decision of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 September 2007 in Case F-146/06, Speiser v Parliament, by which the appellant's application was dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

The appellant submits, in support of his appeal, first of all, that the evidence relevant to the ruling presented by both parties was in part not assessed, contradictorily and/or not properly assessed. He further argues that the Civil Service Tribunal failed to apply the principles of good faith and sound administration to the whole of its decision. Finally, the appellant contends that, by the disputed decision, the Civil Service Tribunal departs from its ruling of 28 June 2006 in Case F-101/05, Grundheid v Commission.

____________