Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisee v Commission
(Case T-113/11) 1
(Action for annulment — Registration of a protected geographical indication — ‘Gouda Holland’ — No interest in bringing proceedings — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisee eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: M. Loschelder and V. Schoene, lawyers)
Defendant: The Commission (represented by: initially, G. von Rintelen and M. Vollkommer, then G. von Rintelen and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: The Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, J. Langer, M. Noort, B. Koopman and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents); and Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie (Zoetermeer, the Netherlands) (represented by: P. van Ginneken, F. Gerritzen and C. van Veen, lawyers)
Re:
Application for the annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1122/2010 of 2 December 2010 entering a designation in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Gouda Holland (PGI)] (OJ 2010 L 317, p.22).
Operative part of the order
The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisee eV shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.
The Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie shall bear their own costs.
________________________1 OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.