ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber)
15 March 2016 (1)
(Rectification)
In Case T‑247/14,
Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co. KG, established in Edewecht (Germany), represented by S. Labesius, lawyer,
applicant,
v
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by A. Poch, acting as Agent,
defendant,
the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, and intervener before the General Court, being
Salumificio Fratelli Beretta SpA, established in Barzanò (Italy) represented by G. Ghisletti, F. Braga and P. Pozzi, lawyers,
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 February 2014 (Case R 1159/2013-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co. KG and Salumificio Fratelli Beretta SpA,
THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber),
composed of S. Frimodt Nielsen (Rapporteur), President, F. Dehousse and A. M. Collins, Judges,
Registrar: E. Coulon,
makes the following
Order
1 On 4 February 2016 the General Court delivered judgment in Case T-247/14.
2 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, it is necessary to rectify a clerical mistake at paragraph 29 of that judgment.
On those grounds,
THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber)
hereby orders:
Paragraph 29 of the judgment should read as follows:
‘As a preliminary point, it must be noted that the applicant’s second plea in law concerns the dismissal of the opposition as regards the goods in Class 29.’
instead of:
‘As a preliminary point, it must be noted that the applicant’s second plea in law seeks to have the opposition dismissed as regards the goods in Class 29.’
Luxembourg, 15 March 2016.
E. Coulon | S. Frimodt Nielsen
Registrar | President |