ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber)
8 May 2024 (*)
(Rectification)
In Case T-652/22 REC,
Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG, established in Neckarsulm (Germany), represented by M. Kefferpütz, K. Wagner and A. Wrage, lawyers,
applicant,
v
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by T. Klee, acting as Agent,
defendant,
the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being
MHCS, established in Épernay (France), represented by O. Vrins, B. Raus and N. Clarembeaux, lawyers,
THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber),
composed of M. J. Costeira, President, P. Zilgalvis (Rapporteur) and E. Tichy‑Fisslberger, Judges,
Registrar: V. Di Bucci,
having regard to the judgment of 6 March 2024, Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO – MHCS (Shade of the colour orange) (T‑652/22, not published, EU:T:2024:152),
makes the following
Order
1 The Court delivered the judgment of 6 March 2024, Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO – MHCS (Shade of the colour orange) (T‑652/22, not published, EU:T:2024:152).
2 By its application under Article 164 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the applicant has applied for rectification of that judgment.
3 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure, it is necessary to rectify, in the version of the language of the case, an obvious inaccuracy found in the phrase ‘the colour sample at issue is digital’ as currently contained in the second sentence of paragraph 51 of that judgment.
On those grounds,
THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber)
hereby orders:
The phrase ‘the colour sample at issue is digital’, as contained in the second sentence of paragraph 51 of the judgment in the language of the case of 6 March 2024, Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO – MHCS (Shade of the colour orange) (T‑652/22, not published, EU:T:2024:152), must be read as ‘the colour sample at issue is digitised’.
Luxembourg, 8 May 2024.
V. Di Bucci | | M. J. Costeira |