Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 September 2014 — Kyocera Mita Europe v Commission
(Case T‑35/11)
Actions for annulment — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff and statistical nomenclature — Classification in the Combined Nomenclature — Tariff subheadings — Customs duties applicable to goods classified under those tariff subheadings — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility
Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Meaning of ‘regulatory act’ in Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU — Any act of general scope for legislative measures — Regulation on the combined nomenclature — Included — Act comprising implementing measures within the meaning of that treaty provision — Existence of internal remedies against those measures — Inadmissibility of the action for annulment (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU; Commission Regulation No 861/2010, Annex) (see paras 33-39, 47, 48, 50, 51, 55)
Re:
| ACTION for annulment in part of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) No 861/2010 of 5 October 2010 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2010 L 284, p. 1). |
Operative part
1. | | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
2. | | It is not necessary to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by Konica Minolta Business Solutions Europe GmbH and Olivetti SpA. |
3. | | Kyocera Mita Europe BV is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |