Action brought on 24 December 2014 — August Brötje v OHIM (HydroComfort)

(Case T-845/14)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: August Brötje GmbH (Rastede, Germany) (represented by: S. Pietzcker and C. Spintig, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘HydroComfort’ — Application No 12 233 763

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2014 in Case R 1302/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Infringement of 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

Infringement of 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.