ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Seventh Chamber)
17 December 2015 (1)
(Rectification of a judgment)
In Case T‑576/13,
Verus Eood, established in Sofia (Bulgaria), represented by C. Röhl, lawyer,
applicant,
v
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by I. Harrington, acting as Agent,
defendant,
the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court, being
Joie International Co., Ltd, established in Hong Kong (China), represented by M. Garayalde Niño and B. Blanco La Roche, lawyers,
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 August 2013 (Case R 715/2012-5), concerning opposition proceedings between Verus Eood and Joie International Co., Ltd,
THE GENERAL COURT (Seventh Chamber),
composed of M. van der Woude, President, I. Wiszniewska-Białecka and I. Ulloa Rubio (Rapporteur), Judges,
Registrar: E. Coulon,
makes the following
Order
1 On 28 October 2015 the General Court delivered the judgment in Case T-576/13.
2 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, it is necessary to rectify a mistake consisting in the omission of a paragraph between the paragraph 41 and the paragraph 42 of that judgment.
On those grounds,
THE GENERAL COURT (Seventh Chamber)
hereby orders:
After paragraph 41 of the judgment, in the version in the language of the case, the following paragraph should be inserted:
“42 In the third place, the Board of Appeal correctly found, and without challenge by the parties, that the distribution channels for the goods at issue were different.”
The following paragraphs should be numbered consecutively, taking into account this rectification.
Luxembourg, 17 December 2015.
E. Coulon | | M. van der Woude |