Order of the General Court of 11 November 2014 — Bergallou v Parliament and Council
(Case T-22/14) 1
(Action for annulment — Reform of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union — Less favourable scheme for lump sum payment of travel expenses and increase of annual leave by additional days off for traveling time — No individual concern — Non-contractual liability — Causal link — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part unfounded in law)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Amal Bergallou (Lot, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)
Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio and E. Taneva, agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A. Bisch, agents)
Re:
First, application for annulment brought on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Article 1(65)(b) and Article 1(67)(d) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 15), in so far as those provisions link the entitlement to reimbursement of travel expenses and travelling time for that travel to receipt of the expatriation or foreign-residence allowance, and, second, application for damages based on Article 340 TFEU, seeking compensation for material and non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant.
Operative part of the order
The action is dismissed.
Ms Amal Bergallou shall bear her own costs and the costs incurred by the European Parliament and by the Council of the European Union.
There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene made by the European Commission.
________________________1 OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.