Action brought on 10 May 2016 — Ipuri v EUIPO — van Graaf (IPURI)

(Case T-226/16)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Ipuri GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: K. Sandberg, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: van Graaf GmbH & Co. KG (Vienna, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘IPURI’ — Application for registration No 8 971 021

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 March 2016 in Case R 886/2015-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 15 in conjunction with Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009, Rule 22(3) and (4) of Regulation No 2868/95 and Article 78(1)(f) of Regulation No 207/2009;

Infringement of Article 8(2)(a) when applying Article 42(3) of Regulation No 207/2009.

____________