Action brought on 25 January 2023 – UF v Commission

(Case T-24/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: UF (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of 6 April 2022 dismissing the applicant;

order the European Commission to pay the applicant a sum set ex aequo et bono for the non-material damage caused and to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons, the applicant’s rights of defence, the duty to have regard to the welfare of officials and the principle of proportionality.

Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment.

Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 2(c) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union.

Fourth plea in law, alleging misuse of powers.

____________