Language of document :

Notice for the OJ

 

    

Action brought on 17 May 2002 by Masdar (U.K.) Ltd against the Commission of the European Communities

    (Case T-159/02)

    Language of the case: English

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 17 May 2002 by Masdar (U.K.) Ltd, represented by Philip Bentley QC and Patrick Green, Barrister.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

listnum "WP List 1" \l 1annul the Commission's Decision contained in its letter of 7 March 2002 refusing access to the documents mentioned in the applicant's confirmatory request dated 3 December 2001;

listnum "WP List 1" \l 1order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant in the present case is the same as in case T-68/02, Masdar (U.K.) -v- Commission, and its object is the Decision of the Commission expressly rejecting the applicant's request for access to the two audit reports mentioned in the notice to the Official Journal of the European Communities relating to the above mentioned case (not yet published).

The applicant submits that the Commission has committed an infringement of Article 253 EC in that the contested Decision failed to give adequate reasons for relying on the mandatory exclusion in the first and second indents of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No. 1049/20011.

The Commission has, in the applicant's view, made a manifest error of assessment in the application of Article 4(2) of this Regulation, in that the contested Decision found that the grant of the applicant's request would undermine the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits, as well as the protection of the commercial interest of a third undertaking.

The applicant contends that the Commission has also made a manifest error of assessment in the application of Article 4(2) of the above mentioned Regulation, and has infringed the general principles of law, in so far as the contested Decision found that there was no overriding public interest in disclosure of the audit reports to the applicant.

____________

1 - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and the Council of 30 May 2001, regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJEC L 145, of 31.3.2001, p. 43).