ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (First Chamber)
11 September 2007(*)
(Rectification)
In Case T-45/01,
Stephen G. Sanders, residing in Oxfordshire (United Kingdom) and 94 other applicants, represented initially by P. Roth QC, I. Hutton, E. Mitrophanous and A. Howard, Barristers, and subsequently by P. Roth QC, I. Hutton and B. Lask, Barristers,
applicants,
v
Commission of the European Communities, represented by J. Currall, acting as Agent,
defendant,
supported by
Council of the European Union, represented initially by J.‑P. Hix and A. Pilette and subsequently by J.‑P. Hix and B. Driessen, acting as Agents,
intervener,
APPLICATION to determine pursuant to the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 October 2004 in Case T‑45/01 Sanders and Others v Commission [2004] ECR II‑3315 the amount of compensation due for the financial loss sustained by each of the applicants as a result of the fact that they were not recruited as members of the temporary staff of the European Communities for the time they worked at the Joint European Torus (JET) Joint Undertaking,
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (First Chamber),
composed of B. Vesterdorf, President of the Chamber, M. Jaeger and H. Legal, Judges,
Registrar: C. Kristensen, Administrator,
makes the following
Order
On 12 July 2007 the Court of First Instance (First chamber) delivered its judgment in the above-mentioned case.
Pursuant to Article 84 (1) of the rules of Procedures of the Court of First Instance, and after the parties have had the opportunity to lodge written observations in accordance with Article 84 (2) thereof, it is necessary to correct two clerical errors which have arisen at paragraphs 94 and 99 of the judgment.
On those grounds,
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (First Chamber)
hereby orders:
Paragraph 94 of the judgment shall read as follows:
“The foregoing assessment is not called into question by the factors which the Commission has relied on.”
Paragraph 99 of the judgment shall read as follows:
“Furthermore, although the applicants have been claiming damages in respect of loss of pension rights from the lodging of their action in 2001 and the interlocutory judgment expressly held that such damages were recoverable in principle, it must be observed that the Commission has not adduced evidence of the accuracy of its allegation or submitted details as to the practical difficulties liable to result therefrom.”
Luxembourg, 11 September 2007.
E. Coulon | B. Vesterdorf
Registrar | President |