Action brought on 27 March 2024 – DI v Parliament

(Case T-173/24)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: DI (represented by: S. Rodríguez Bajón and A. Gómez-Acebo Dennes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the Decision of 30 January 2024 of the President of the European Parliament finding that the applicant had engaged in psychological harassment;

annul the Decision of 30 January 2024 of the President of the European Parliament imposing a reprimand on the applicant for having engaged in conduct amounting to psychological harassment;

annul any action related to the above acts;

order the European Parliament pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.

First plea in law, alleging failure to observe the applicant’s rights of defence and the right to sound administration.

Second plea in law, alleging failure to comply with procedural deadlines.

Third plea in law, alleging misuse of powers.

Fourth plea in law, alleging error of assessment.

Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty of confidentiality and care in the processing of personal data.

____________