Language of document : ECLI:EU:T:2021:770


 


 



Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 November 2021 –
Nissan Motor v EUIPO – VDL Groep (VDL E-POWERED)

(Case T756/20)

(EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VDL E-POWERED – Earlier national figurative marks e-POWER – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

1.      EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Protection of trade marks registered in the United Kingdom – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Effect

(Art. 50 TEU; Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, Art. 127)

(see paras 15-17)

2.      EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Direction addressed to the Office – Precluded

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 72(6))

(see para. 20)

3.      EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Criteria for assessment

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Recital 11 and Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 25, 26, 67-70)

4.      EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Determination of the relevant public – Attention level of the public

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see para. 27)

5.      EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Criteria for assessment

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 31-33, 40)

6.      EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Assessment of the distinctive character of an element of which a trade mark is composed

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see para. 39)

7.      EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Word mark VDL E-POWERED – Figurative marks e-POWER

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 74, 76, 79, 82)

8.      EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Weak distinctive character of the earlier mark – Effect

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see para. 78)

9.      Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope – Plea based on absence or inadequacy of the statement of reasons – Plea alleging incorrectness of the statement of reasons – Distinction

(Art. 296 TFEU)

(see para. 95)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 October 2020 (Case R 2915/2019-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Nissan Motor and VDL Groep.

Operative part

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Nissan Motor Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and of VDL Groep BV.