Action brought on 24 November 2006 - Boston Scientific v OHIM - Terumo (CAPIO)
(Case T-325/06)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Boston Scientific Ltd (Christ Church, Barbados) (represented by: P. Rath and W. Festl-Wietek, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Terumo Kabushiki Kaisha (Tokyo, Japan)
Form of order sought
- Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 September 2006, served to the representatives of the plaintiff on 18 September 2006, in Case R 61/2006-2;
order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark 'CAPIO' for goods in class 10 - application No 2 554 434
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Terumo Kabushiki Kaisha
Mark or sign cited: The national and Community word marks 'CAPIOX' and 'CAPIOX PULSE' for goods in class 10
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Opposition Division's decision
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 43 of Council Regulation No 40/94 and Rule 22 of Commission Regulation No 2868/95 as Terumo failed to prove sufficient use of its trade mark, and of Article 8(1)(b) of the Council regulation as the conflicting trade marks are not likely to be confused.
____________