Action brought on 29 March 2024 – DH v Commission

(Case T-171/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: DH (represented by: A. Tymen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare the present action admissible and well founded;

annul the Commission’s decision of 15 February 2023, refusing to recognise the occupational origin of the applicant's invalidity;

annul the decision of 20 December 2023, communicated by email of 20 December 2023, rejecting the applicant's complaint of 15 May 2023;

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

First plea in law, alleging a failure to comply with the obligation to state reasons.

Second plea in law, alleging the existence of a flawed opinion of the Invalidity Committee and of a manifest error of assessment.

____________