Order of the General Court of 26 January 2012 - Mojo Concerts and Amsterdam Music Dome Exploitatie v Commission
(Case T-90/09)
(State aid - Action for annulment - Investment of the Gemeente Rotterdam in the Ahoy' complex - Decision finding that there was no State aid - Applicants not individually concerned - Inadmissibility)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicants: Mojo Concerts BV (Delft, Netherlands) and Amsterdam Music Dome Exploitatie BV (Delft, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Beeston, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and K. Gross, Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Noort, C. Wissels, M. de Grave, Y. de Vries and J. Langer, agents); Gemeente Rotterdam (Netherlands) (represented by: J. Feenstra and J. Fanoy, lawyers); and Ahoy' Rotterdam NV (Rotterdam) (represented initially by M. van der Woude and E. Offers, and subsequently by M. Maas-Cooymans, lawyers)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 6018 final of 21 October 2008 on the investment made by the Gemeente Rotterdam in the Ahoy' complex (State aid C 4/2008 (ex N 97/2007, ex CP 91/2007)).
Operative part of the order
The Court:
1. Dismisses the action as inadmissible;
2. Orders Mojo Concerts BV and Amsterdam Music Dome Exploitatie BV to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, the Gemeente Rotterdam and Ahoy' Rotterdam NV;
3. Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs.
____________1 - OJ C 102, 1.5.2009.