Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 5 November 2008 – Neoperl Servisys v OHIM (HONEYCOMB)
(Case T-256/06)
Community trade mark – Application for the Community word mark HONEYCOMB – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of goods (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 29-33, 39)
Re:
| ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 July 2006 (Case R 1388/2005-4) concerning an application to register the word mark HONEYCOMB as a Community trade mark. |
Information relating to the case
Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Neoperl Servisys AG |
Community trade mark sought: | Word mark HONEYCOMB for goods in Class 11 – Application No 2906139 |
Decision of the Examiner: | Registration refused |
Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |
Operative part
The Court:
2. | | Orders Neoperl Servisys AG to pay the costs. |