Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Request for a preliminary ruling – Raad van State Interpretation of Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (OJ 2000 C 364, p. 1) and of Article 15(6) of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98) – Detention measures – Extension – Lack of cooperation on the part of the nationals concerned in the deportation procedure – Breach of the rights of the defence – Right of every person to be heard before an individual measure is taken which would adversely affect that person
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.01 Border checks, asylum and immigration
4.06.01.04 Immigration policy
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 41
-P2 : paragraphs 1, 21
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A23BIS : paragraph 24
-
TFEU, Article 267
: paragraph 22
-
Directive 2008/115
: paragraphs 24, 31, 36, 37, 43
-
Directive 2008/115
-A01 : paragraph 4
-
Directive 2008/115
-A02 : paragraph 5
-
Directive 2008/115
-A15 : paragraphs 6, 41
-
Directive 2008/115
-A15P2 : paragraphs 27, 29, 39, 45
-
Directive 2008/115
-A15P6 : paragraphs 1, 21, 27, 30, 44, 45
-
Directive 2008/115
-C11 : paragraph 3
-
Directive 2008/115
-C13 : paragraphs 3, 42
-
Directive 2008/115
-C16 : paragraph 3
-
Directive 2008/115
-C2 : paragraph 42
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A107 : paragraphs 22, 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -301/87
: paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/96
: paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -28/05
: paragraph 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -349/07
: paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -141/08
: paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/09
: paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/10
: paragraph 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -584/10
: paragraphs 32, 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -96/11
: paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -277/11
: paragraph 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/11
: paragraph 43
Operative part
Opinion
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 6
: point 55
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 41
: points 6, 44 - 48
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 41
-P2 : point 24
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 41
-P2LA : points 1, 4, 37, 45, 49 - 53, 61 - 66, 86
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
: points 44 - 47
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
-L1 : point 7
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
-L2 : point 7
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 48
: point 44
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 48
-P2 : point 7
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
-P1 : point 8
-
Directive 2008/115
-A06P1 : point 54
-
Directive 2008/115
-A07P1 : point 54
-
Directive 2008/115
-A08P1 : point 54
-
Directive 2008/115
-A08P4 : point 54
-
Directive 2008/115
-A15 : points 9, 54, 55
-
Directive 2008/115
-A15P1 : points 39, 64
-
Directive 2008/115
-A15P2 : points 38, 48, 61 - 66, 86
-
Directive 2008/115
-A15P4 : point 39
-
Directive 2008/115
-A15P6 : points 1, 5, 24, 37, 53, 65, 86
-
Directive 2008/115
-A16 : point 54
-
Directive 2008/115
-C1 : point 51
-
Directive 2008/115
-C2 : point 54
-
Directive 2008/115
-C4 : point 39
-
Directive 2008/115
-C6 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A107 : point 25
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/78
: points 34, 41, 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -142/87
: point 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -135/92
: point 68
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -32/95
: points 49, 68
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/98
: point 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -462/98
: points 49, 68
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -194/99
: point 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -287/02
: point 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -300/03
: point 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -28/05
: points 29, 68, 71, 74, 78
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/05
: points 29, 73, 74, 78, 83, 84
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -349/07
: points 49, 58, 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/09
: points 72 - 74, 76, 78
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/09
: point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -584/10
: points 49, 73, 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -61/11
: points 54, 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -277/11
: points 44, 51
-
Court of Justice - View C-61/11
: point 54
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
10/09/2013
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 260 from 07.09.2013, p.34
Judgment: OJ C 325 from 09.11.2013, p.8
Name of the parties
G. and R.
Notes on Academic Writings
- Pastor, Jean-marc: La violation du droit des étrangers d'être entendus doit s'apprécier in concreto, L'actualité juridique ; droit administratif 2013 p.1717 (FR)
- Reneman, A.M.: Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2013 nº 404 (NL)
- Aubert, Michel ; Broussy, Emmanuelle ; Cassagnabère, Hervé: Chronique de jurisprudence de la CJUE. Une violation du droit d'être entendu n'entraîne la levée de la mesure de rétention prise dans le cadre d'une procédure administrative que si celui qui l'invoque a été effectivement privé de la possibilité de mieux faire valoir sa défense dans une mesure telle que cette procédure aurait pu aboutir à un résultat différent, L'actualité juridique ; droit administratif 2013 p.2307-2309 (FR)
- Gazin, Fabienne: Droit d'être entendu dans le cadre d'une rétention préparant un retour. La Cour donne une portée minimale au droit d'être entendu dans le cadre d'une rétention administrative et vide de son sens la philosophie générale de la rétention des ressortissants d'États tiers en situation irrégulière, Europe 2013 Novembre Comm. nº 11 p.26-27 (FR)
- Mok, M.R.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2014 n° 3 (NL)
- Wassenaar, Florimond: Rechtspraak Vreemdelingenrecht 2013 (Ed. Ars Aequi Libri - Nijmegen) 2013 p.454-455 (NL)
- Duijkersloot, Ton: Consequences of the Violation by Administrative Authorities of the Right to be heard under EU Law: the Case M.G. and N.R., Review of European administrative law 2014 p.81-96 (EN)
- Carlier, Jean-Yves: Droit européen des migrations, Journal de droit européen 2014 nº 207 p.105-114 (FR)
- Bartolini, Silvia: Judicial Review of Detention before Removal and Fundamental Rights Protection – The case of M.G. and N.R. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie , Cyprus Human Rights Law Review 2014 Vol.3 p.36-52 (EN)
- Waasdorp, Jim: Drie arresten die relevant zijn voor horen voorafgaand aan terugkeerbesluit, Asiel en Migrantenrecht 2015 p.395-398 (NL)
- Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Leboeuf, Luc: Droit européen des migrations, Journal de droit européen 2018 p.95-110 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Raad van State - Netherlands
Subject-matter
- area of freedom, security and justice
- Fundamental rights
- - Charter of Fundamental Rights
Provisions of national law referred to
Vreemdelingenwet 2000, art. 59, lid 1, aanhef en onder a, 94 en 106, lid 1 Vreemdelingenbesluit 2000, art. 5.1a, lid 1 Algemene wet bestuursrecht, art. 2:1, lid 1, en 4:8, lid 1
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Preliminary reference - urgent procedure
Formation of the Court
deuxième chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Bonichot
Advocate General
Wathelet
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion