Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Annulment of Commission Decision C(2011) 956 final of the Commission of 23 February 2011 declaring incompatible with the internal market the aid granted by Italy for metal producers Portovesme, ILA and Eurallumina, in the form of a preferential electricity scheme implemented in 2004 and planned for 2005 for these companies and also for Syndial.

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• C1996/288/04 : paragraphs 38, 39, 43, 45, 62, 66, 88
• TFEU, Article 108 : paragraph 60
• TFEU, Article 108 -P3 : paragraph 60
• TFEU, Article 263 : paragraph 36
• TFEU, Article 296 : paragraphs 36, 44
• Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31998Y0310(01) : paragraphs 86, 92, 94
• Regulation 659/1999 -A14P1 : paragraph 54
• Decision 2006/323 : paragraph 95
• Decision 2011/956 : paragraphs 30 - 105
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/69 : paragraph 80
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/77 : paragraph 59
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -322/81 : paragraph 74
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -265/85 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -301/87 : paragraphs 47, 72
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -350/88 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/90 : paragraph 100
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -355/95 : paragraphs 96, 97
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -367/95 : paragraphs 32, 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/97 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -156/98 : paragraphs 74, 85
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -17/99 : paragraph 32
• General Court - Judgment T -127/99 : paragraphs 47, 72
• General Court - Judgment T -158/99 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 : paragraph 71
• General Court - Judgment T -198/01 : paragraph 44
• General Court - Judgment T -49/02 : paragraph 74
• General Court - Judgment T -171/02 : paragraph 80
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -88/03 : paragraphs 74, 76
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -172/03 : paragraph 74
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -148/04 : paragraphs 74, 75, 78
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/04 : paragraphs 74, 75, 78
• General Court - Judgment T -304/04 : paragraph 49
• General Court - Judgment T -427/04 : paragraph 60
• General Court - Judgment T -162/06 : paragraph 36
• General Court - Judgment T -332/06 : paragraphs 43, 59, 70, 80
• General Court - Judgment T -263/07 : paragraph 100
• General Court - Judgment T -62/08 : paragraph 104
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/09 : paragraph 80
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -194/09 : paragraphs 70, 85
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -369/09 : paragraph 58
• General Court - Judgment T -123/09 : paragraphs 32, 44
• General Court - Judgment T -138/09 : paragraph 80
• General Court - Judgment T -328/09 : paragraphs 58 - 60
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/10 : paragraph 85
• General Court - Judgment T -257/10 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -630/11 : paragraph 87

Operative part

• Confirms : Regulation 746/2011

Opinion

Information not available

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 13/06/2011

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

16/10/2014

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 421 from 24.11.2014, p.30

Application: OJ C 238 from 13.08.2011, p.30

Name of the parties

Eurallumina v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Idot, Laurence: Notion d'aide et tarif préférentiel d'électricité, Europe 2014 Décembre Comm. nº 12 p.30 (FR)
2. Verney, Céline: Pas de dessert pour les gros ... électro-intensifs, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence : droit, économie, régulation 2015 nº 43 p.41-42 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

• Competition
  
• - State aid
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
  

Formation of the Court

Information not available

Judge-Rapporteur

Wetter

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

• Italian
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

Information not available