Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)
Subject-matter
Annulment of Commission Decision C(2011) 956 final of the Commission of 23 February 2011 declaring incompatible with the internal market the aid granted by Italy for metal producers Portovesme, ILA and Eurallumina, in the form of a preferential electricity scheme implemented in 2004 and planned for 2005 for these companies and also for Syndial.
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.05 Legal acts of the European Union
2.05.06 Statement of reasons
|
|
|
3.02.04.04 Infringement of essential procedural requirements
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.02 Actions for annulment
3.02.04 Pleas in law
3.02.04.04 Infringement of essential procedural requirements
|
|
|
1.01.02.03 Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.01 Sources of EU law
1.01.02 General principles of law
1.01.02.03 Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.04 Procedure for reviewing aid
4.09.04.08 Implementation of the Commission decision and recovery
4.09.04.08.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.01 Definition of aid
4.09.01.03 Advantage conferred on an undertaking
4.09.01.03.00 General
|
|
|
4.09.02 Damage to competition and effect on trade
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.02 Damage to competition and effect on trade
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.03 Exceptions to the prohibition of aid
4.09.03.02 Aid that may be considered to be compatible with the internal market (Article 107(3) TFEU)
4.09.03.02.02 Regional aid
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.04 Fundamental rights
1.04.03 The fundamental rights
1.04.03.41 Right to good administration
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
C1996/288/04
: paragraphs 38, 39, 43, 45, 62, 66, 88
-
TFEU, Article 108
: paragraph 60
-
TFEU, Article 108
-P3 : paragraph 60
-
TFEU, Article 263
: paragraph 36
-
TFEU, Article 296
: paragraphs 36, 44
-
Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31998Y0310(01)
: paragraphs 86, 92, 94
-
Regulation 659/1999
-A14P1 : paragraph 54
-
Decision 2006/323
: paragraph 95
-
Decision 2011/956
: paragraphs 30 - 105
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/69
: paragraph 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/77
: paragraph 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -322/81
: paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -265/85
: paragraph 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -301/87
: paragraphs 47, 72
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -350/88
: paragraph 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/90
: paragraph 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -355/95
: paragraphs 96, 97
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -367/95
: paragraphs 32, 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/97
: paragraph 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -156/98
: paragraphs 74, 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -17/99
: paragraph 32
-
General Court - Judgment T -127/99
: paragraphs 47, 72
-
General Court - Judgment T -158/99
: paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00
: paragraph 71
-
General Court - Judgment T -198/01
: paragraph 44
-
General Court - Judgment T -49/02
: paragraph 74
-
General Court - Judgment T -171/02
: paragraph 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -88/03
: paragraphs 74, 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -172/03
: paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -148/04
: paragraphs 74, 75, 78
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/04
: paragraphs 74, 75, 78
-
General Court - Judgment T -304/04
: paragraph 49
-
General Court - Judgment T -427/04
: paragraph 60
-
General Court - Judgment T -162/06
: paragraph 36
-
General Court - Judgment T -332/06
: paragraphs 43, 59, 70, 80
-
General Court - Judgment T -263/07
: paragraph 100
-
General Court - Judgment T -62/08
: paragraph 104
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/09
: paragraph 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -194/09
: paragraphs 70, 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -369/09
: paragraph 58
-
General Court - Judgment T -123/09
: paragraphs 32, 44
-
General Court - Judgment T -138/09
: paragraph 80
-
General Court - Judgment T -328/09
: paragraphs 58 - 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/10
: paragraph 85
-
General Court - Judgment T -257/10
: paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -630/11
: paragraph 87
Operative part
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
16/10/2014
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 421 from 24.11.2014, p.30
Application: OJ C 238 from 13.08.2011, p.30
Name of the parties
Eurallumina v Commission
Notes on Academic Writings
- Idot, Laurence: Notion d'aide et tarif préférentiel d'électricité, Europe 2014 Décembre Comm. nº 12 p.30 (FR)
- Verney, Céline: Pas de dessert pour les gros ... électro-intensifs, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence : droit, économie, régulation 2015 nº 43 p.41-42 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
Formation of the Court
Information not available
Judge-Rapporteur
Wetter
Advocate General
Information not available
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available